<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frank Groeneveld &#187; wordpress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frankgroeneveld.nl/tag/wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frankgroeneveld.nl</link>
	<description>Just another weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:20:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Symphony CMS; the Best CMS?</title>
		<link>http://frankgroeneveld.nl/2010/08/11/symphony-cms-the-best-cms/</link>
		<comments>http://frankgroeneveld.nl/2010/08/11/symphony-cms-the-best-cms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank Groeneveld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webapps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expression engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symphony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankgroeneveld.nl/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been looking for a good Content Management System (CMS) the last couple of days after a colleague and I had some discussion about what CMS to use for our clients. Sometimes we have clients with specific needs, which are difficult to fulfill using WordPress....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for a good Content Management System (CMS) the last couple of days after a colleague and I had some discussion about what CMS to use for our clients. Sometimes we have clients with specific needs, which are difficult to fulfill using <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a>. The solution we used to choose was either build some plugins or use our custom developed CMS. However, none of these are a great solution. WordPress can be complicated for novice computer users, has a messy code-base and our own CMS is not really user-friendly either.</p>
<p>My colleague decided to try out <a href="http://expressionengine.com/">ExpressionEngine</a>. He bought the freelancer edition and he&#8217;s been trying things out. Up until now, it all seems to work quite well, although the back-end can still be too complicated for our clients. Also, I hate the fact that you should pay 300 dollars to use ExpressionEngine for a commercial company. Thats an added fee some customers would rather spend on different things.</p>
<p>So, I started to search for open-source CMSes myself and made a list of requirements.</p>
<ul>
<li>It should not be page based, it should allow you to model your own content. If you use a CMS that supports types/entities/resources/sections/whatever you can create your own page type, but you can also create more advanced things like portfolio items, projects or products (yes, even a simple web shop is possible then).</li>
<li>The back-end should be as simple as possible.</li>
<li>It should be written in PHP, object-oriented if possible, and use MySQL for storage.</li>
<li>There should be a good, flexible templating engine for the views.</li>
<li>It should have a good plugin API.</li>
</ul>
<p>Well, using this list it was a lot easier to search for the most fitting CMS, as quite a lot CMSes are only page or post based. The list of possible candidates shrunk by more than 75%. Eventually I found a CMS I had never heard of, but which seemed to have all the things we were looking for: Symphony CMS.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying it out in the last few days and I still haven&#8217;t found any deal-breakers. <a href="http://symphony-cms.com/">Symphony CMS</a> has a great website, friendly community (because it&#8217;s still small I think), great features, simple back-end, small code-base and it can be easily extended by writing extensions.</p>
<p>Some things might give problems for specific clients though: multi file upload is non-existant (there&#8217;s one extension that doesn&#8217;t do what it should) and the WYSIWYG editor extensions, with support for placing images etc., don&#8217;t seem to be integrated well enough with Symphony CMS yet. Well, maybe I&#8217;ll just fix those two myself and contribute them upstream. That is, if I have some spare time&#8230; <img src='http://frankgroeneveld.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankgroeneveld.nl/2010/08/11/symphony-cms-the-best-cms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress 2.9 released</title>
		<link>http://frankgroeneveld.nl/2009/12/19/wordpress-2-9-released/</link>
		<comments>http://frankgroeneveld.nl/2009/12/19/wordpress-2-9-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank Groeneveld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugin upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts trash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techfield.org/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WordPress 2.9 was just released. All in all this seems to be a great release again, including some features I had been looking forward to: Easier bulk plugin upgrades In browser image editing A trash for posts you remove, so you can undo it if...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress 2.9 was just <a href="http://wordpress.org/development/2009/12/wordpress-2-9/">released</a>. All in all this seems to be a great release again, including some features I had been looking forward to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Easier bulk plugin upgrades</li>
<li>In browser image editing</li>
<li>A trash for posts you remove, so you can undo it if necessary</li>
</ul>
<p>Upgrade now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankgroeneveld.nl/2009/12/19/wordpress-2-9-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
